Maybe you need some help

February 28, 2006 at 7:42 pm (God Things)

Ok.  The baby pictured is my firstborn, delivered November 21, 1975, 12:28 pm.  A new friend of mine was a delivery nurse for 14 years before she married and moved to East Tennessee.  I told her the details surrounding this child’s appearance on planet Earth.  Her jaw dropped and her eyes bugged.  This is the same kid who got his private pilot’s license at age 17? Yes.  He’s normal?  Uh, yeah, better than. Why?  He should be profoundly retarded if not dead. He must have been hung up by his shoulders.  Huh?  It was at that point I remembered asking the doctor in the delivery room, what would have happened 100 years ago in a covered wagon.  Without hesitation, "Dead.  Both of you in the same grave."  Gee, thanks, doc.  I’m really tired now.

(Son, you’ve heard the story before and I won’t carry on with all the details for several reasons, one being that your wife is looking forward to a pleasant delivery.  Jules, you’ll be fine. You know that.  I am extremely comfortable for you.  Mine was a rare experience and medical science has come a long way in 30 years.)

First child, 10 lb. 5 oz.  The hospital was in the midst of remodelling, meaning the labor room was a regular room, the delivery room was temporary–also in a regular room.  Fetal monitoring was new and commanded less respect than it does now.  Ultra sound, which would have shown the need for a C-section, was new and used only on high risk patients.  X-rays were not an option.  Having no negative history of my own or negative family history on either side, no diabetes, no heart problems, etc., no ultra sound was done.

I had gone to the childbirth classes, a modification of Lamaze, so I was determined and prepared to deliver without drugs.  The staff, including the doctors, quietly snorted enmasse:  "You’ll beg for drugs, honey (snigger, snigger)."  Little respect was shown in 1975 for the effort to deliver naturally.  The first 12 hours of labor were textbook according to the training.  The breathing techniques really did mask the pain of labor contractions to the point of NO ACTUAL PAIN,  only an intense squeezing sensation.  (There, I said it.) 

Twelve hours after the first sign of labor, 6:30 am, the doctor announced that full dilation had occured, and as soon as he sewed up a guy in the ER who got his arm caught in a snowblower, we were going to have a baby.  By the time the doctor realized the kid was too far through the canal for a safe C section, he had to deal with his being stuck.  Further details witheld.

I learned many years later that this child’s bulk saved him by keeping the placenta smooshed against the uterin wall and attached, allowing the necessary oxygen supply to continue during six hours of pushing, not six pushes.  Positioned anywhere other than next to his body, it would not have been held in place.  Being held up by his shoulders gave the doctor time to use, in Bill Cosby’s terms, the "salad spoons" twice, first the head, is-it-a-boy-or-a-girl-I-don’t-know-by-the-top-of-the-head, then the shoulders, to deliver my wonderful son who is now grown, married, and a daddy twice over.

So.  How old is the child in the picture?

Brenda, you’re too high.  Stan, you are too.  However, I feel validated by your participation.  Thank you.

I called Laurie, the delivery nurse, to give her a chance at a guess.  She was napping.  I talked to her husband, Tom, and he guessed.  WAY high, Tom.

There are some people for whom God has a calling and there is nothing that will stop Him.  My baby should have suffered severe brain damage were it not for Someone with better ideas.  I wonder, who in the lineage has a grand calling for the Kingdom?

Who, I ask you, Who, is in control? (woo-hoo, yay God!)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Guess the Baby’s Age

February 23, 2006 at 7:08 pm (Kid Tales)

big-baby.jpgTake a look at the jolly tummy and the happy feet.

How old is this baby?

I’ll give you until Monday evening ok, Tuesday, to submit your answer. 

The winner will be announced the following day and gets to pat him/herself on the back.

Permalink 9 Comments

Russel, meet Owen

February 21, 2006 at 10:09 pm (Family R Us)

Russells_27th

Owen, Owen_waving

meet your Daddy’s Poppy, 4 days shy of 27 in this shot.   

Owen Russel Brock, named after E. Russel Murphy, his great-grandfather, is waving.  Hi, everybody!

ETA is August 5th, give or take according to Owen’s whims. 

The original Pop & Nan are watching, the current Pop & Nan are waiting.

God bless you, littlest one.  Your big brother hasn’t caught on to who you are yet, but when he does, he’ll be the best brother you can have.

Permalink 1 Comment

Are We Ready for Another Round!

February 19, 2006 at 7:45 pm (God Things)

Some of my best inspiration comes to me when I am in the car.  There is no respectable pad of paper, not even a discarded bulletin on which I can write between the choir practice announcement and the reminder of the 55+ bingo party,  so I scratch something on the back of a deposit slip or gas receipt.  One subject I thought about stemmed from yesterday’s disorganized laundry day, a new reality show:  "Digging for Underwear While Hubby is Starting the Car ‘Cause We’re Late" or how about this one?  "Coffee Pot Graveyard, subtitled Will Anyone Buy a Carafe at a Yard Sale?"

I get to the computer and something else comes out of the keyboard.

In a recent phone conversation talking about Small Groups, I mentioned The Jesus People Movement of the late 60’s, early ’70s.  "Who?"  Read the 3 articles about its beginnings as well as its progress and current influence among us today.  Being a baby boomer, having been in Minneapolis during 1969 through 1972 and having been in the middle of a house church that exploded into a mega church downtown Minneapolis in 1971, I was stunned that knowledge of such a crazy ball of fire revival was now forgotten.  It was comparable to the Brownsville Revival about 9 or 10 years ago.  Come to think of it, I haven’t heard much chatter about that one in a while.  I guess I’ve answered my own question.  Were they just a pentecostal thing and therefore not noted seriously by the mainline?

Now there is a growing Small Group movement.  It’s softer, lower key, not a tidal wave among a particular group, but a new phyn pha phenomenon (I used to be the dictionary, now I need it!)  in all denominations and growing in a quiet, strong way–not a "flash in the pan", a term my mother used to describe Elvis Presley.  Boy, was she wrong.

I don’t diminish the Small Group growth in any way nor do I disrespect the powerful impact and thousands of saved souls from the two predominantly pentecostal movements mentioned.  Different strokes, y’know?  The Small Group of today was originally called the Cell Group about 8 years ago in that when attendance in each group reached 14, it was time to multiply like a cell into two groups, and so on.  Since 9/11 the word "Cell" is understandably gone.

I love the analogy from today’s sermon.  The Giant Redwoods trunks are massive, their height is incredible, but their root systems are shallow.  One would think the roots would reach downward in direct proportion to their height, but instead they grow laterally and intertwine with each other’s root systems so that one cannot be easily discerned from another’s.  They literally hold each other up, bonded, much like Christians reaching out to each other, linking arms, and bearing one another’s burdens as in Galations 6:2.

I think the current analogy for the Small Group would be that it is like a "grass roots" movement that will grow to become increasingly more like the redwoods, the holy, spotless bride that will be excitedly watching for Jesus’ return.  In the Small Group of a dozen or less, you can learn to trust each other with your deepest hurts and needs, feel free to participate in the study of scripture and ask questions, not have to worry about any structure except what the group decides on.   You can fellowship, study, pray, and am I the only one who sees a reflection of the early church that met in caves?  Get a copy of Mega Shift from my book list.

It’s these groups that will make the long haul, strengthening the believer into boldness when a world government makes public worship illegal and/or regulates religion into something unrecognizable to the true believer in Christ.  And when this comes to pass….

There will be an explosive revival of glorious proportions dwarfing the "teasers" we’ve seen in the last 100 plus years, a revival that will rock the socks off unbelievers world wide.  The whole world won’t be saved but those who ultimately reject Yeshua Messiah at that point will have a crystal clear understanding of exactly Who they are rejecting.

It’s rumbling oh, so softly in today’s homes around the world, in the Small Groups.

Permalink 1 Comment

Another Purpose Driven Thought

February 17, 2006 at 11:05 am (God Things)

"It’s not about you."

I cleared that hurdle and here came the "purpose" concept.  When the light finally dawned, I realized that my Purpose cannot be confused with my Calling.  I’d gone back and forth until I was out of breath yakking about gifts and talents before I made that distinction.  Purpose is universal.  Callings are what He gives us to do.  Obedience is our response.

Whew.  What freedom to know that I don’t have to wait for angel appearances and trumpets.  Step One: I worship and pray.  Step Two:  I listen while I continue step one.  Step Three: Obey and continue with steps one and two. 

I carry with me a powerful statement from a preacher (whom I downright didn’t like). When I complained that "I don’t hear God’s voice" he replied "He knows how to speak to you."  And He has.  I can hear when I listen.

Permalink 5 Comments

Shoppin’ an’ Hoppin’ Churches

February 15, 2006 at 8:45 pm (God Things)

What_is_church
Church:  a noun, a verb, an adjective.  It’s a building, a denomination, a label, a group, a power as in "church and state."  We go to church, we are churched. 

Why do we go to the church building?  Because we are the church, as in the body of Christ.  Is it much deeper than that, or is it more self-centered?

This morning in the car we were listening to local talk radio, talking about whatever they were talking about, paused to listen again and then my mind started bouncing aimlessly off its little skull walls.  I came up with the greatest blog.  By the time we turned into the parking lot, my thought processes came and went like pixie dust.  Gone.  Father Time smacked me upside the head again.  Home now, let’s try again.

Churches.  Buildings are being burned in Alabama.  Whoever the pyro(s) are, they have failed in a possible attempt to slow down the progress of the church which is the body of Christ.  They have caused financial set-backs, they have hurt feelings in whole groups of people, and they, like the 9/11 terrorists, have fueled a resolve and ultimately strengthened instead of destroyed.

Immediately after the 9/11 attack, the churches were more populated.
Why?  Shortly after the Twin Towers’ dust settled, they were back to
pre-9/11 attendance.  Why?

Why do we attend church, the weekly event?  Habit?  Did Mama tell you you would go to hell if you didn’t?  Or do you love God and go to be fed?  And how are you fed?  How are your needs met?  Maybe the music touches your soul.  Or the eloquence of the prayers, the power of the sermon’s delivery, the hush that wraps you during communion?  Are you swept up with clapping and rythm or do you soak in the stillness among bowed heads? Are you more comfortable with solemn tradition or dancing  down the aisle, raising of hands and shouting Amen at the preacher’s presentation, or do you connect with the familiar liturgy? And if you don’t find what you want in one building on one Sunday (in the back row), do you go to another building the next Sunday, and then another and then another?  There’s nothing wrong with trying to find a personality fit;  it may even be necessary to your spirit.  But please visit more than once, maybe more than 6 or 8 Sundays before you hop to another one.

Two years ago our entire church, I mean, congregation, participated in a study of Rick Warren’s Purpose Driven Life.  Used to launch Small Groups, the ministry is thriving  and continues to grow.

Why do we as individuals exist?  Are we an accident?  What is each person’s purpose?  The first statement in chapter 1 is:  "It’s not about you." THUNDERCLAP!  Then who? What?  I come to church to have my soul fed, my needs met, and in the style and atmosphere of my choice and it’s not about ME??

It’s been two years since we read the book.  The church, I mean the organization, sent out at least a thousand  invitations to the community.  We had video presentations in church, I mean worship service, VHS tapes for the small groups, the book plus workbooks, key chains, memorization assignments, and signage all over the place.  I may need to refresh my memory on a few details but two things have stayed in the front of my mind from that whole experience.  They are….

1. The reason I exist is to worship my Creator.  It’s not about me.  Yeshua Messiah wants to be on the throne, not just in the room.  He earned the spot, He qualified.  I worship with the Body of believers in a building on a preset schedule, Sunday morning, but His Holy Spirit trains and molds me Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday.  Alone with Him is where I am fed spinach, meat, and potatoes.  Sometimes I need to sit in the corner and reflect.   

2. I am to worship Him in spirit and in truth.  Notice I did not capitalize the word spirit.  For years I have interpreted this scripture to mean that I had to concentrate really hard in church, I mean, oh, you know what I mean–the service–until I felt I had connected with the Holy Spirit, you know, inspired, and then raising my hands in worship was supposed to be practically involuntary.

Shocker!  I am to worship Him in MY spirit, truthfully.  I am to reach out to Him.  I am not there to get, but to give from inside me.  The reason I go to the church building to meet with the church body is to join in worship of Yeshua, Messiah.

Once you have your priorities lined up, He meets all your needs and you are fed.

Permalink 2 Comments

Happy Valentine’s Day

February 14, 2006 at 4:17 pm (Special)

Our 34 Valentine celebrations have been peppered with not enough budget, where to find a babysitter, forgetfulness, having to work if it’s a night the family furniture store was open, a hockey game or other school function, you name it, we’ve tripped over it.

Two other interferences, if you want to call it that, was my birthday on the 2nd and my friend’s on Valentine’s.  We would go out to dinner on the weekend in between, making another dent in the checkbook.  You can do only so much.

As a result, Valentine’s Day has taken a backseat or not even been in the vehicle more often than I can remember.  We therefore, when we could, asked if the kids could go see Grandma, and treated ourselves to heart shaped steaks — T-bones — on the grill at home.

This year is no exception.  We have a new goal oriented budget, just as strict as ever, and even though we don’t have little kids to find a temporary place for, we are enjoying steaks at home.

Some say that in a good relationship, every day is Valentine’s Day.  Ehhhh, ok for them, but not for me.  I want it all — not just any flowers, but red roses, I don’t need a big box of chocolates, a few will satisfy the sweet tooth.  I want my steaks medium rare in a restaurant for which one wears dress-up clothes (no drive thru window, please), preferrably a place with live music that doesn’t promote deafness, an orchestra perhaps.  Maybe dancing?  We’ve hardly ever done that, but the older I get…..  Someday.  Someday, I will signal that we are in a better financial condition and then, watch out… I want to celebrate them all in style as stated above — Valentine’s, birthdays, anniversary, Mother’s Day, yea even Veteran’s Day if we haven’t been out in a while.  Maybe a cruise …

Remember I said I went to Madam Butterfly when Honey was out of town?  I am historically not an opera fan–I am not ready to listen to a CD but will go to a performance on rare ocassions. I am surprised how much I really do enjoy it.  Donna got the tickets, I fed us, and we went to the opera.   I don’t do romance novels that give off steam on the shelf, I intensely dislike soaps, and I’ve outgrown dragging Honey to sappy chick flicks if he is in the least unwilling to go.

It was a beautifully done production, written in the early 1900’s, charming stage setting, beautiful theatre, an afternoon well spent.  Fifteen year old  Butterfly falls for an American naval officer who marries her, uses her, leaves her, and returns with his American wife to take their child away from her, a prospect so unbearable, she takes her own life.  Knowing the ending doesn’t ruin the experience, much like watching Uncle Buck for the 28th time.  How do you like that for philosophy?

Madam Butterfly was the romance this year.  Honey’s off the hook except for the steaks.

Now I want to see The Mikado .

Permalink Leave a Comment

An E. Russell Murphy day

February 12, 2006 at 10:01 pm (Special)

February 12, 1907 Elmer Russell Murphy debuted in Cameron, Illinois.  If he were alive to celebrate, he would be 99 years old.  He would also not call it celebrating to still be anchored to planet Earth after 99 long years.  85 years, 10 months, and 11 days was more than enough for him by the time he got that far.  His strength, youth, and independence being stripped from him, it was time to hit the trail in December 23, 1992.

Hey Dad! If they have balloons in Heaven, pop one for me and remember the time I popped one behind your head in the car hurtling down a hot New Mexico road in 1950-something.

(He’s laughing.  I always could make him laugh.)

Permalink 3 Comments

Peggy, they’ve got me on ignore…

February 12, 2006 at 9:47 pm (Day to Day)

Hah?

"Hah" is a version of "huh" with a short A vowel sound.

Louder, as if I didn’t know her response is habit, I say "I said, they have me on ignore."

Our intercoms at work are from the 80’s, perhaps mid to early 80’s, or before.  Frankly, I’ve seen better systems in B&W Bogart B flicks.  The phones are pulse instead of dial.  How far back does that go?  But, you know, "If it’s not broke, don’t fix it."  I thought it’s supposed to be "brokEN," but what do I know?

There are other ways to be "on ignore."  In a world full of cell phones, voice mail, pagers, Blueberries (what? Blackberries? Who names this stuff?), email, text messaging, and whatever else, isn’t being left alone and being in control, responding at my personal convenience a goal?  That depends.  Some may see these advances as another form of a black hole.

Eye contact and verbal as well a physical response is food for the soul.  A response indicates we matter, we exist, we are worth attention.

What happens when a parent calls a child to dinner and the child does not respond?  If the parent is really the parent, the child will ultimately wish he had responded before the parent’s queries escalated into something unpleasant.  People want a response to the first reasonable contact effort, not the 10th, not the 4th, not nothing.

We check our email to see if anyone wanted to contact us for anything and to see if someone we sent an email to responded.  The first thing we look at when we get home at day’s end is the answering machine. 

Way back before this flurry of options in communication technology, before Mr. Bell spilled acid on himself and yelled over the first phone line (I’ll bet he was really interested in a response!), we had paper and ink.  As a genealogist, I highly respect notes and letters.  My mother and her sister, my Aunt Elva, had an ongoing letter writing conversation.  More than a few weeks would pass and one of them would fire off another letter chewing the other out  — "sorry about your broken arm" — for lack of response at which point the ensuing response would suggest that the other was in error (that’s "full of beans" for the lay person).  They had fun, too.  Neither of them were upset at being chewed.  Guilt was not a verb then.

Future genealogists will have nothing to save in scrapbooks if no one prints emails. 

At work, the person on the other end of the intercom is likely out of earshot.  That’s understandable.  Email may not be checked for hours.  Hollering down the hallway is seldom an option.  Not professional, either.  So we get out of our chairs and hunt ‘em down if it’s important enough.  They weren’t ignoring me.  They just hadn’t gotten the message yet.

Permalink 1 Comment

Semantics

February 10, 2006 at 5:01 pm (Let's Talk, Nostalgia)

Antipathy: noun. opposition in feelings.
Aversion: noun. feeling of repugnance toward; a settled dislike.
Criticize: verb. to stress the faults of.
Hate: noun. an intense hostility; an aversion deriving from anger; extreme dislike or antipathy.
Hate: verb. a strong aversion toward.

Without going into painful details explaining how and why, I had a great deal of time on my hands in junior high and high school after the homework and any home chores were done. I read a lot of books. Delivering book reports was not a problem as I had a stack that I’d already read. The books available were in Mom’s collection. Having been born in 1908, Mom’s library, mostly novels with poor, but beautiful heroines who regularly swooned, was from her generation and before her generation. They had a lot of big words in them.

I understand and am more than able to use eloquent words, words my dad referred to as 50 cent words, too fancy for the common man in an ordinary conversation. My peers had a hard time following me and would comment harshly. I caved. That could explain the criticism that I am blunt. (sigh)

Still, when I’m intensely expressing myself, I may pull out the half dollar venacular and fail to notice puzzled faces. As a result, I again put more effort in being understood in a shorter period of time with simpler verbosity rather than attempting to impress a disinterested audience with my lofty level of profundity. In other words, I back off, still careful with the grammar and pronunciation only because I am my mother’s daughter. We don’t want anyone spinning in her grave any more than she is already. In her world, accurate spelling held equal court with the written use of the language.

One of her greatest peeves was the harsh usage of the word hate. She had three daughters, passionate in their opinions and quick to voice them, too often using (that word). But, Mom, I really do (don’t you say it!). Man, you’d think I was cussin’. (There’s a G on the end of that, young lady!) You know, it’s really hard (difficult) for a kid in the heat of an angry moment to process more sophisticated terms rather than something so simple as (that word), namely the terms listed at the beginning of this post.

Recently I went on record using (that word) when I should have stopped long enough to reach for the dictionary and seek more acceptable terminology, terms which convey the message in a more intellectual manner without the coarseness of the four letter one. That’s what Mom was trying to force into our heads, not political correctness, a condition I have yet to totally embrace in all circumstances. In short, sometimes you have to smack the mule between the eyes with the 2×4 when you can’t gently point him in the preferred direction with a smile. Keep in mind the gentle attitude and smile must be tried first.

I apologize for the low-end terminology. (Happy now, Mom?) I was not intentionally lobbing the words at any specific individual. I was responding to the assumptions resulting in a global lashing out from all sources. I spoke out of frustration over the repetition of a particular criticism that has been on most occasions less than comprehensive in its scope e.g. Bush lied, people died. A chant. An angry, automatic and empty chant, when it’s delivered heatedly without any effort to consider the alternative. A lie is not a lie when the one speaking believes it to be the truth. And, yes, I was wide awake watching on live TV the admission of that statement from Michael Moore himself to Bill O’Reilly referring to President Bush as the speaker. Now we see new reports that WMDs thought to exist, then not exist, may actually exist. How quickly we assume what is true and what is not true when we want to believe something in particular.

Saying “intensely dislike” doesn’t gloss over anything. Yet, for the sake of decency and gracious courtesy, we can and should use 50 cent words to get our point across unless it’s absolutely, positively necessary to pull the 2×4 out of the back pocket. Use as much wisdom as possible.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »